Zephyr Memory Storage (ZMS)

Zephyr Memory Storage is a new key-value storage system that is designed to work with all types of non-volatile storage technologies. It supports classical on-chip NOR flash as well as new technologies like RRAM and MRAM that do not require a separate erase operation at all, that is, data on these types of devices can be overwritten directly at any time.

General behavior

ZMS divides the memory space into sectors (minimum 2), and each sector is filled with key-value pairs until it is full.

The key-value pair is divided into two parts:

The key part is written in an ATE (Allocation Table Entry) called “ID-ATE” which is stored starting from the bottom of the sector
The value part is defined as “DATA” and is stored raw starting from the top of the sector

Additionally, for each sector we store at the last positions Header-ATEs which are ATEs that are needed for the sector to describe its status (closed, open) and the current version of ZMS.

When the current sector is full we verify first that the following sector is empty, we garbage collect the N+2 sector (where N is the current sector number) by moving the valid ATEs to the N+1 empty sector, we erase the garbage collected sector and then we close the current sector by writing a garbage_collect_done ATE and the close ATE (one of the header entries). Afterwards we move forward to the next sector and start writing entries again.

This behavior is repeated until it reaches the end of the partition. Then it starts again from the first sector after garbage collecting it and erasing its content.

Composition of a sector

A sector is organized in this form (example with 3 sectors):

Sector 0 (closed)	Sector 1 (open)	Sector 2 (empty)
Data_a0	Data_b0	Data_c0
Data_a1	Data_b1	Data_c1
Data_a2	Data_b2	Data_c2
GC_done	.	.
.	.	.
.	.	.
.	ATE_b2	ATE_c2
ATE_a2	ATE_b1	ATE_c1
ATE_a1	ATE_b0	ATE_c0
ATE_a0	GC_done	GC_done
Close (cyc=1)	Close (cyc=1)	Close (cyc=1)
Empty (cyc=1)	Empty (cyc=2)	Empty (cyc=2)

Definition of each element in the sector

Empty ATE: is written when erasing a sector (last position of the sector).

Close ATE: is written when closing a sector (second to last position of the sector).

GC_done ATE: is written to indicate that the next sector has been already garbage collected. This ATE could be in any position of the sector.

ID-ATE: are entries that contain a 32 bits Key and describe where the data is stored, its size and its crc32

Data: is the actual value associated to the ID-ATE

How does ZMS work?

Mounting the Storage system

Mounting the storage starts by getting the flash parameters, checking that the file system properties are correct (sector_size, sector_count …) then calling the zms_init function to make the storage ready.

To mount the filesystem some elements in the zms_fs structure must be initialized.

struct zms_fs {
        /** File system offset in flash **/
        off_t offset;

        /** Storage system is split into sectors, each sector size must be multiple of
         * erase-blocks if the device has erase capabilities
         */
        uint32_t sector_size;
        /** Number of sectors in the file system */
        uint32_t sector_count;

        /** Flash device runtime structure */
        const struct device *flash_device;
};

Initialization

As ZMS has a fast-forward write mechanism, we must find the last sector and the last pointer of the entry where it stopped the last time. It must look for a closed sector followed by an open one, then within the open sector, it finds (recover) the last written ATE (Allocation Table Entry). After that, it checks that the sector after this one is empty, or it will erase it.

ZMS ID-Data write

To avoid rewriting the same data with the same ID again, it must look in all the sectors if the same ID exist then compares its data, if the data is identical no write is performed. If we must perform a write, then an ATE and Data (if not a delete) are written in the sector. If the sector is full (cannot hold the current data + ATE) we have to move to the next sector, garbage collect the sector after the newly opened one then erase it. Data size that is smaller or equal to 8 bytes are written within the ATE.

ZMS ID/data read (with history)

By default it looks for the last data with the same ID by browsing through all stored ATEs from the most recent ones to the oldest ones. If it finds a valid ATE with a matching ID it retrieves its data and returns the number of bytes that were read. If history count is provided that is different than 0, older data with same ID is retrieved.

ZMS free space calculation

ZMS can also return the free space remaining in the partition. However, this operation is very time consuming and needs to browse all valid ATEs in all sectors of the partition and for each valid ATE try to find if an older one exist. It is not recommended for application to use this function often, as it is time consuming and could slow down the calling thread.

The cycle counter

Each sector has a lead cycle counter which is a uin8_t that is used to validate all the other ATEs. The lead cycle counter is stored in the empty ATE. To become valid, an ATE must have the same cycle counter as the one stored in the empty ATE. Each time an ATE is moved from a sector to another it must get the cycle counter of the destination sector. To erase a sector, the cycle counter of the empty ATE is incremented and a single write of the empty ATE is done. All the ATEs in that sector become invalid.

Closing sectors

To close a sector a close ATE is added at the end of the sector and it must have the same cycle counter as the empty ATE. When closing a sector, all the remaining space that has not been used is filled with garbage data to avoid having old ATEs with a valid cycle counter.

Triggering Garbage collection

Some applications need to make sure that storage writes have a maximum defined latency. When calling a ZMS write, the current sector could be almost full and we need to trigger the GC to switch to the next sector. This operation is time consuming and it will cause some applications to not meet their real time constraints. ZMS adds an API for the application to get the current remaining free space in a sector. The application could then decide when needed to switch to the next sector if the current one is almost full and of course it will trigger the garbage collection on the next sector. This will guarantee the application that the next write won’t trigger the garbage collection.

ATE (Allocation Table Entry) structure

An entry has 16 bytes divided between these variables :

struct zms_ate {
        uint8_t crc8;      /* crc8 check of the entry */
        uint8_t cycle_cnt; /* cycle counter for non-erasable devices */
        uint16_t len;      /* data len within sector */
        uint32_t id;       /* data id */
        union {
                uint8_t data[8]; /* used to store small size data */
                struct {
                        uint32_t offset; /* data offset within sector */
                        union {
                                uint32_t data_crc; /* crc for data */
                                uint32_t metadata; /* Used to store metadata information
                                                    * such as storage version.
                                                    */
                        };
                };
        };
} __packed;

Note

The CRC of the data is checked only when the whole the element is read. The CRC of the data is not checked for a partial read, as it is computed for the whole element.

Note

Enabling the CRC feature on previously existing ZMS content without CRC enabled will make all existing data invalid.

Available space for user data (key-value pairs)

For both scenarios ZMS should always have an empty sector to be able to perform the garbage collection (GC). So, if we suppose that 4 sectors exist in a partition, ZMS will only use 3 sectors to store Key-value pairs and keep one sector empty to be able to launch GC. The empty sector will rotate between the 4 sectors in the partition.

Note

The maximum single data length that could be written at once in a sector is 64K (This could change in future versions of ZMS)

Small data values

Values smaller than 8 bytes will be stored within the entry (ATE) itself, without writing data at the top of the sector. ZMS has an entry size of 16 bytes which means that the maximum available space in a partition to store data is computed in this scenario as :

\[\small\frac{(NUM\_SECTORS - 1) \times (SECTOR\_SIZE - (5 \times ATE\_SIZE))}{2}\]

Where:

NUM_SECTOR: Total number of sectors

SECTOR_SIZE: Size of the sector

ATE_SIZE: 16 bytes

(5 * ATE_SIZE): Reserved ATEs for header and delete items

For example for 4 sectors of 1024 bytes, free space for data is \(\frac{3 \times 944}{2} = 1416 \, \text{ bytes}\).

Large data values

Large data values ( > 8 bytes) are stored separately at the top of the sector. In this case, it is hard to estimate the free available space, as this depends on the size of the data. But we can take into account that for N bytes of data (N > 8 bytes) an additional 16 bytes of ATE must be added at the bottom of the sector.

Let’s take an example:

For a partition that has 4 sectors of 1024 bytes and for data size of 64 bytes. Only 3 sectors are available for writes with a capacity of 944 bytes each. Each Key-value pair needs an extra 16 bytes for ATE which makes it possible to store 11 pairs in each sectors (\(\frac{944}{80}\)). Total data that could be stored in this partition for this case is \(11 \times 3 \times 64 = 2112 \text{ bytes}\)

Wear leveling

This storage system is optimized for devices that do not require an erase. Using storage systems that rely on an erase-value (NVS as an example) will need to emulate the erase with write operations. This will cause a significant decrease in the life expectancy of these devices and will cause more delays for write operations and for initialization. ZMS uses a cycle count mechanism that avoids emulating erase operation for these devices. It also guarantees that every memory location is written only once for each cycle of sector write.

As an example, to erase a 4096 bytes sector on a non-erasable device using NVS, 256 flash writes must be performed (supposing that write-block-size=16 bytes), while using ZMS only 1 write of 16 bytes is needed. This operation is 256 times faster in this case.

Garbage collection operation is also adding some writes to the memory cell life expectancy as it is moving some blocks from one sector to another. To make the garbage collector not affect the life expectancy of the device it is recommended to correctly dimension the partition size. Its size should be the double of the maximum size of data (including extra headers) that could be written in the storage.

See Available space for user data (key-value pairs).

Device lifetime calculation

Storage devices whether they are classical Flash or new technologies like RRAM/MRAM has a limited life expectancy which is determined by the number of times memory cells can be erased/written. Flash devices are erased one page at a time as part of their functional behavior (otherwise memory cells cannot be overwritten) and for non-erasable storage devices memory cells can be overwritten directly.

A typical scenario is shown here to calculate the life expectancy of a device: Let’s suppose that we store an 8 bytes variable using the same ID but its content changes every minute. The partition has 4 sectors with 1024 bytes each. Each write of the variable requires 16 bytes of storage. As we have 944 bytes available for ATEs for each sector, and because ZMS is a fast-forward storage system, we are going to rewrite the first location of the first sector after \(\frac{(944 \times 4)}{16} = 236 \text{ minutes}\).

In addition to the normal writes, garbage collector will move the still valid data from old sectors to new ones. As we are using the same ID and a big partition size, no data will be moved by the garbage collector in this case. For storage devices that could be written 20000 times, the storage will last about 4.720.000 minutes (~9 years).

To make a more general formula we must first compute the effective used size in ZMS by our typical set of data. For id/data pair with data <= 8 bytes, effective_size is 16 bytes For id/data pair with data > 8 bytes, effective_size is 16 bytes + sizeof(data) Let’s suppose that total_effective_size is the total size of the set of data that is written in the storage and that the partition is well dimensioned (double of the effective size) to avoid having the garbage collector moving blocks all the time.

The expected life of the device in minutes is computed as :

\[\small\frac{(SECTOR\_EFFECTIVE\_SIZE \times SECTOR\_NUMBER \times MAX\_NUM\_WRITES)}{(TOTAL\_EFFECTIVE\_SIZE \times WR\_MIN)}\]

Where:

SECTOR_EFFECTIVE_SIZE: is the size sector - header_size(80 bytes)

SECTOR_NUMBER: is the number of sectors

MAX_NUM_WRITES: is the life expectancy of the storage device in number of writes

TOTAL_EFFECTIVE_SIZE: Total effective size of the set of written data

WR_MIN: Number of writes of the set of data per minute

Features

ZMS has introduced many features compared to existing storage system like NVS and will evolve from its initial version to include more features that satisfies new technologies requirements such as low latency and bigger storage space.

Existing features

Version1

Supports non-erasable devices (only one write operation to erase a sector)
Supports large partition size and sector size (64 bits address space)
Supports 32-bit IDs to store ID/Value pairs
Small sized data ( <= 8 bytes) are stored in the ATE itself
Built-in Data CRC32 (included in the ATE)
Versionning of ZMS (to handle future evolution)
Supports large write-block-size (Only for platforms that need this)

Future features

Add multiple format ATE support to be able to use ZMS with different ATE formats that satisfies requirements from application
Add the possibility to skip garbage collector for some application usage where ID/value pairs are written periodically and do not exceed half of the partition size (there is always an old entry with the same ID).
Divide IDs into namespaces and allocate IDs on demand from application to handle collisions between IDs used by different subsystems or samples.
Add the possibility to retrieve the wear out value of the device based on the cycle count value
Add a recovery function that can recover a storage partition if something went wrong
Add a library/application to allow migration from NVS entries to ZMS entries
Add the possibility to force formatting the storage partition to the ZMS format if something went wrong when mounting the storage.

ZMS and other storage systems in Zephyr

This section describes ZMS in the wider context of storage systems in Zephyr (not full filesystems, but simpler, non-hierarchical ones). Today Zephyr includes at least two other systems that are somewhat comparable in scope and functionality: NVS and FCB. Which one to use in your application will depend on your needs and the hardware you are using, and this section provides information to help make a choice.

If you are using a non-erasable technology device like RRAM or MRAM, ZMS is definitely the best fit for your storage subsystem as it is designed to avoid emulating erase operation using large block writes for these devices and replaces it with a single write call.
For devices with large write_block_size and/or needs a sector size that is different than the classical flash page size (equal to erase_block_size), ZMS is also the best fit as there is the possibility to customize these parameters and add the support of these devices in ZMS.
For classical flash technology devices, NVS is recommended as it has low footprint (smaller ATEs and smaller header ATEs). Erasing flash in NVS is also very fast and do not require an additional write operation compared to ZMS. For these devices, NVS reads/writes will be faster as well than ZMS as it has smaller ATE size.
If your application needs more than 64K IDs for storage, ZMS is recommended here as it has a 32-bit ID field.
If your application is working in a FIFO mode (First-in First-out) then FCB is the best storage solution for this use case.

More generally to make the right choice between NVS and ZMS, all the blockers should be first verified to make sure that the application could work with one subsystem or the other, then if both solutions could be implemented, the best choice should be based on the calculations of the life expectancy of the device described in this section: Wear leveling.

Recommendations to increase performance

Sector size and count

The total size of the storage partition should be well dimensioned to achieve the best performance for ZMS. All the information regarding the effectively available free space in ZMS can be found in the documentation. See Available space for user data (key-value pairs). We recommend choosing a storage partition that can hold double the size of the key-value pairs that will be written in the storage.
The size of a sector needs to be dimensioned to hold the maximum data length that will be stored. Increasing the size of a sector will slow down the garbage collection operation which will occur less frequently. Decreasing its size, in the opposite, will make the garbage collection operation faster which will occur more frequently.
For some subsystems like Settings, all path-value pairs are split into two ZMS entries (ATEs). The header needed by the two entries should be accounted when computing the needed storage space.
Using small data to store in the ZMS entries can increase the performance, as this data is written within the entry header. For example, for the Settings subsystem, choosing a path name that is less than or equal to 8 bytes can make reads and writes faster.

Dimensioning cache

When using ZMS API directly, the recommended cache size should be, at least, equal to the number of different entries that will be written in the storage.
Each additional cache entry will add 8 bytes to your RAM usage. Cache size should be carefully chosen.
If you use ZMS through Settings, you have to take into account that each Settings entry is divided into two ZMS entries. The recommended cache size should be, at least, twice the number of Settings entries.

Sample

A sample of how ZMS can be used is supplied in Zephyr Memory Storage (ZMS).

API Reference

The ZMS subsystem APIs are provided by zms.h:

ZMS data structures

ZMS API

Related code samples

Zephyr Memory Storage (ZMS)Store and retrieve data from storage using the ZMS API.